Recommendations, December 2010

Here is list of various material worth recommending, I've come across in December 2010. The recommendations are listed in a chronological order, based on when I noticed them, the latest are at the bottom of the list.

  • Article | Julian Guthrie: 'Google's doodlers humanize technology with art' (San Francisco Chronicle) (read)
  • Article | Lebanon defense minister 'offered invasion advice for Israel' (Haaretz) (read)
  • Article | Asher Moses: 'Assuie 'fail whail' designer's next big hit' (The Age) (read)
  • iPhone app | Center for Responsive Politics: 'OpenSecrets.org Unveils New iPhone App' (read)
  • Article | Chris Elliott: 'The readers' editor on why we were right to publish the WikiLeaks material' (The Guardian) (read)
  • Article | The Economist: 'WikiLeaks: Read cables and red faces' (read)
  • Article | The Economist: 'WikiLeaks: Unpluggable' (read)
  • Report | The Asia Foundation: 'Afghanistan in 2010: A survey of the Afghan people' (read)
  • Article | David Nolen: 'Designing Election Results on the iPad' (The New York Times' "Open" blog) (read)
  • Article | Asher Moses: 'The Aussie who blitzed Visa, MasterCard and PayPal with the Low Orbit Ion Cannon' (The Age) (read)
  • Article | Dan Nystedt: 'WikiLeaks founder praised by Pentagon Papers exposer' (Computerworld) (read)
  • Article | B.G.: 'The 24-hour Athenian democracy' (The Economist's "Babbage" blog) (read)
  • Article | Simon Phipps: 'The Risks of Cloud: Lessons from Wikileaks' ("Simon Says…" blog at Computerworld UK) (read)
  • Book | Frederick Forsyth: 'The Odessa File' (1972)
  • Video: | Vlad Savov: 'Kinect finally fulfills its Minority Report destiny (video)' (Engadget) (watch)
  • Article | The Economist: 'Dealing with WikiLeaks:  The right reaction' (read)
  • Article | Raffi Khatchadourian: 'No secrets – Julian Assange’s mission for total transparency' (The New Yorker) (read)
  • Book | Richard Matheson: 'I Am Legend' (1954)
  • Book | Mario Puzo: 'The Godfather' (1969)
  • Book | Sylvester Roepstorff: 'Da Middelhavet forsvandt' [in Danish] (2010)
  • Book | Sanne Udsen: 'Psykopater i jakkesæt' [in Danish] (2006)
  • Article | The Economist: 'WikiLeaks, protest and the law: The rights and wrongs of hacktivism' (read)

How Google managed to get hosted by one.com

If you accessed Google's Danish frontpage (google.dk) yesterday evening/late afternoon, you were met by the following words: "google.dk is hosted by one.com".

This was not due to a wish from Google to switch to one.com's hosting service, but an error from (apparently) the Danish Google offices, according to Danish tech news site, Version2[1]

It seems that a Google employee requested to have the google.dk domain moved to one.com's DNS name server. DK-Hostmaster, who are administrating the .dk top-level domain, sent an email to the registrar, Google, and asked for confirmation. Once this was given, the domain was moved to one.com's DNS, and thus failing to work.

According to one.com they have no clue what went on but started forwarding all traffic to google.dk to google.com which worked as normal.

The problem got fixed yesterday evening after approximately an hour of downtime.

Update:
Google has has now said that the problem arose because of a partner[2]. According to Danish tech news site Version2, it is MarkMonitor who is Google's partner on domain issues – and therefore might be the one to blame.

Notes:
  1. Read: Version2.dk: Error upon error: All Danish Google traffic ended up at one.com [in Danish] []
  2. Read: Version2: Google approved mysterious domain move: A partner caused the error [in Danish] []

Recommendations, November 2010

Here is list of various material worth recommending, I've come across in November 2010. Since this is the first list, including recommendations from previous months, it might be more thorough than the following ones will be.

The recommendations are listed in a chronological order, based on when I noticed them, the latest are at the bottom of the list.

  • Book | Hugh Pope: 'Dining With al-Qaeda'
  • Book | Augustus Richard Norton: 'Hezbollah'
  • Article | Michael Crawford and Jami Miscik: 'The Rise of the Mezzanine Rulers' (read)
  • Article | The Economist: 'The future of NATO: Fewer dragons, more snakes' (read)
  • Book | Hans Prehn: 'Mordet på kreativiteten' [in Danish]
  • Article | Cathy Scott-Clark and Adrian Levy: 'Lost boys of Pakistan' (The Guardian Weekly)
  • Article | Julian Borger: 'Lost warhead uranium lures the black market' (The Guardian Weekly)
  • Book | Wojciech Jagielski: 'Towers of Stone – The Battle of Wills in Chechnya'
  • Article | Hugh Pope: 'Pax Ottomana?' (read)
  • Article | The Economist: 'Israel, the United States and Palestine: Fix those borders first (read)
  • Article | Karen DeYoung: 'NATO adopts transition plan for Afghan war' (The Washington Post) (read)
  • Article | Tim Berners-Lee: 'Long Live the Web: A Call for Continued Open Standards and Neutrality' (read)
  • Article | Scott Rosenberg: 'Why the Daily, Murdoch’s “tablet newspaper,” will be DOA' (read)
  • Article | The Economist: 'Lebanon and the region: Can there be justice as well as stability? (read)
  • Article | Paul Sonne and John W. Miller: 'EU Chews on Web Cookies' (The Wall Street Journal) (read)
  • Article | The Economist: 'Psychopathy: Socially challenging' (read)
  • Article | Isabel Kershner: 'Western Wall Feud Heightens Israeli-Palestinian Tensions' (The New York Times) (read)
  • Video | BBC News: 'Why I choose to watch CCTV' (watch)
  • Article | Dusan Stojanovic: 'Serbia shifting West, away from Russia' (The Kansas City Star) (read)
  • Article | Scott Shane and Andrew W. Lehren: 'Cables Shine Light Into Secret Diplomatic Channels' (The New York Times) (read)
  • Article | Kabir Chibber and Rory Cellan Jones: 'Location is everything: Tech hubs thrive in a supposedly virtual world' (BBC News) (read)
  • Article | Karen DeYoung and John Pomfret: 'U.S. says foreign ties can withstand leaks' (The Washington Post) (read)
  • Article | Harriet Sherwood: 'Battle brews to prevent a 'new Berlin wall' on the Israeli-Lebanese border' (The Guardian Weekly)

Share a name with a bad guy? Change it, you might end up spending months in Afghanistan

The latest Wikileaks leaks are out. This time the information being made public is cables sent from the US embassies around to the world to the US State Department. The New York Times has a long article about some of the bits of information being leaked[1].

One of the stories involves a German person who's only fault is that he or she had the same name as a wanted militant:

American officials sharply warned Germany in 2007 not to enforce arrest warrants for Central Intelligence Agency officers involved in a bungled operation in which an innocent German citizen with the same name as a suspected militant was mistakenly kidnapped and held for months in Afghanistan.

A senior American diplomat told a German official “that our intention was not to threaten Germany, but rather to urge that the German government weigh carefully at every step of the way the implications for relations with the U.S.

The New York Times has also published the original cable[2].

One thing is the pressure from the US not to arrest the CIA persons involved. Another is kidnapping an innocent person on the one charge of having a certain name.

So maybe it's a good idea to check the list of wanted persons. If one of them has the same name as you, now might be a good time to change it.

Notes:
  1. The New York Times: Cables Shine Light Into Secret Diplomatic Channels []
  2. Read the entire cable []

US willing to pay 20 stealth fighters for Israeli building freeze

The US Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, has asked the Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu for a 90 day freeze on settlement buildings in the occupied Palestinian West Bank.

Instead of relying on any good will (or faith) there is a airborne reward in store for Israel, writes The Economist:

In return for a new freeze, America says it will give Israel another 20 F-35 stealth fighters, worth $3 billion, to be added gratis to the original 20 ordered by Israel for delivery in the middle of the next decade.

America also promises to stiffen its backing for Israel at the UN and in particular to veto moves to endorse a Palestinian declaration of independence if the talks fizzle.[1]

Photo: Rob Shenk (Flickr)

Notes:
  1. The Economist: 'Fix those borders first' []

What the Axis of Evil meant for the War on Terror in Afghanistan

In September 2009 I read an article in Newsweek, entitled 'Eight Years On, A diplomat's perspective on the post-9/11 world'[1]. The article was written by Ryan Crocker who "is a Career Ambassador within the United States Foreign Service and a recipient of the Presidential Medal of Freedom. He was the United States Ambassador to Iraq until 2009; he previously served as the U.S. ambassador to Pakistan from 2004 to 2007, to Syria from 1998 to 2001, to Kuwait from 1994 to 1997, and to Lebanon from 1990 to 1993"[2].

In the article, which is still a very good read, Crocker talks about the situation in Afghanistan in the days when George W Bush declared his 'Axis of Evil', and how it affected the anti-Taliban coorporation with Iran – who Bush named as a part of the axis. And as I once again came to think of the article, I wanted to share this perticular part:

So were the Iranians [glad to see us return], whose diplomats on the ground seemed eager to work with us and with the new Afghan government led by Hamid Karzai. One of the issues we were trying to sort out in those early days was the fate of former Afghan prime minister Gulbuddin Hekmatyar, one of the most brutal and duplicitous of the mujahedin leaders in the 1980s and '90s, when he'd had close ties to the Pakistani intelligence services and, it was widely reported, to the CIA. Hekmatyar was under a kind of luxurious house arrest in north Tehran. Everyone understood that he had ties to Osama bin Laden, and that if he were free he'd do anything he could to take power from Karzai. We talked to the Iranians about what a great and good thing it would be if they moved Hekmatyar from house arrest to real arrest and transferred him to Afghan custody. Of course we wanted them to do something similar with any Qaeda fugitives they'd picked up. All that was on the table.

Then President Bush gave his first State of the Union address in January 2002, denouncing the Axis of Evil, which he defined as Iraq, North Korea—and Iran. Shortly thereafter, our "Geneva group" met in Kabul. The Iranian looked at me. "What are you guys doing?" he said. I don't know exactly what I answered, something along the lines of, "Look, I'm the guy in Kabul. We need to focus on the concrete issues with which we've been dealing." But I knew my job had just gotten a lot harder. Soon afterward the Iranians not only released Hekmatyar from house arrest, they reinserted him back into Afghanistan. Today his Hezb-i-Islami organization is one of the deadliest insurgent forces in eastern Afghanistan, where U.S. troops have taken their highest casualties since 2001.

True causality[3].

Notes:
  1. Read the Newsweek article online []
  2. Wikipedia: Ryan Crocker []
  3. Wikipedia: Causality []

Hizbullah, more than a terrorist organisation

Hizbullah logo

Nothing is either black or white, this is especially true when it comes to the Middle East. Lebanon's Shiite resistance movement turned political party, Hizbullah (in English 'Hezbollah')[1], is, of course, no exception.

In the past few days I've had the pleasure of reading Augustus Richard Norton's short story about the organisation, simply titled 'Hezbollah'[2].

Norton, who has written several books on the subject, tells the entire history of the organisation, from the Lebanese civil war (largely caused by the Palestinian state-in-the-state), the 1982 Israeli invasion that was the direct cause of the founding of Hizbullah, to more recent events – the book was published in 2007, with an afterword from 2009.

Terror? Humanitarian work? Both?
One thing is clear: Hizbullah cannot simply be labeled as a "terrorist organisation", even if some US and, especially, Israeli officials might desire it so.

In the article 'The Rise of Mezzanine Rulers' in the November/December 2010 edition of Foreign Affairs[3] Michael Crawford and Jami Miscik describe the difficulties in labelling Hizbullah:

The movement is at once a religious organization, an aid organization, a political party, and a paramilitary force. This makes it hard for governments to know how to categorize and confront it. The U.S. government, for example, considers Hezbollah a terrorist organization and has banned its television programs, financial arms, and charity activities from operating in the United States.

The British government proscribes only Hezbollah's military wing, including its External Security Organisation, but allows the group's political, social, and welfare elements to proceed unhindered.

For example, Hizbullah created the Jihad al-Bina' Development Organisation that reconstructs and repair damages caused by war[4]. So, while some countries see  an organisation of terrorists launching rockets into Israel, large parts of the Lebanese population see an organisation rebuilding demolished and damaged houses so they can move back in.

This humanitarian effort was heavily needed after the 2006 Lebanon War[5], when Israeli military bombed southern Lebanon after the kidnapping of two Israeli soldiers and the killing of three others.

The history, in brief
Hizbullah started out as a Shiite resistance group (emerging from the Shiite movement founded by Imam Musa al-Sadr[6] ), with Iranian support, to counter the 1982 invasion of Libanon by Israel and as a backer of the Palestinian cause, thereby countering the Amal Movement[7]. Since then, Hizbullah has – after internal disagreement – changed into a political party as well, navigating in the politic landscape of Lebanon, with Syrian support. One of the more prominent pro-election persons in Hizbullah was Shaikh Muhammad Hussein Fadlallah[8].

Hizbollah did not fade away after the Israeli withdrawal in 2000, which is largely thought to have been caused by Hizbullah. Instead, it plays a solid role in the domestic politics of Libanon and still in conflicts with Israel (latest in 2006[9] ) and the government (latest in 2008[10] ). Especially the role as the sole defence versus Israeli aggression is the main reason why Hizbullah can hold on too it's excessive weapons. U.S. Secretary of Defense, Robert Gates, in April 2010 said that »Hezbollah has more missiles and rockets than most governments«[11] and Norton writes that »the [Lebanese] army's modest capacity lends substance to the argument that Hezbollah is more capable of defending Lebanon than the national army«[12].

What Norton does the very best is to explain both the history of Hizbullah, but also the history of Lebanon and that fateful civil war that lasted 15 years[13], which is important to understand Hizbullah's role, both in relation to Israel – but also in relation to the Lebanese interior. In more recent events, Hizbullah remains under suspicion in relation to the 2005 killing of former Lebanese Prime Minister, Rafiq Hariri[14].

The book ends with a, looking at the modest size of the book, good amount of tips for further reading on the subject of Hizbullah and/or Lebanon.

Hereby highly recommended as a great primer.

And when you're done with the book, I suggest you read Crawford and Miscik's 'The Rise of the Mezzanine Rulers' article in Foreign Affairs[15] about how the international community can work with organisations like Hizbullah.

Notes:
  1. Wikipedia: Hezbollah []
  2. Buy 'Hezbollah' at amazon.co.uk []
  3. Read 'The Rise of Mezzanine Rulers (requires subscription, or can be bought as a PDF document) []
  4. Norton, 2007: p. 110 []
  5. Wikipedia: 2006 Lebanon War []
  6. Wikipedia: Musa al-Sadr []
  7. Wikipedia: Amal Movement []
  8. Norton, 2007: p. 99 []
  9. Wikipedia: 2006 Lebanon War []
  10. Wikipedia: 2008 conflict in Lebanon []
  11. Read 'The Rise of Mezzanine Rulers (requires subscription, or can be bought as a PDF document []
  12. Norton, 2007: p. 164-165 []
  13. Wikipedia: Lebanese Civil War []
  14. Read: Bilal Y. Saab: Lebanon's Unfulfilled Promise []
  15. Read 'The Rise of Mezzanine Rulers (requires subscription, or can be bought as a PDF document []

Danish People's Party wants nudity, not cookies, for immigrants

The Danish Immigration Service[1] has created a small film about Denmark as a country to serve as a preparation for a test, which all immigrants applying for family reunification will have to take.

According to Nordjyske.dk (a news service/newspaper in Northern Jutland), the people of the right-wing party Danish People's Party are disappointed that there aren't any bare breasts in the film[2].

Peter Skaarup[3] who is the party's spokesperson on immigration matters says:

If you are coming from a strictly religious society, it might be something you could be puzzled by and think "oh no, we don't want to have to have anything to do with that".

In a way, bare breats would make it clear, that it is something you can find at a Danish beach.

In other news, the Danish People's Party is also unhappy with something else. Clearly it is more important for the party to be unhappy than to celebrate that they have managed to plunge Denmark into what they themselves call "the tightest immigration policy in Europe"[4].

Apparently, immigrants are not only stealing our jobs. No, immigrants are also the reason why some doctors and hospitals are no longer serving free drinks and cookies.

In the party's newsletter[5], an article reads:

By know it is commonly known that immigrants leave a not very lucky mark on the service that is being offered – or, more correctly, was offered at doctors and at the country's hospitals.  First, the free coffee, juice and cookies or fruit was abolished at many doctors' clinics because patients with immigrant background invited the entire family to join them in the waiting room where they made industrious use of the free food and drinks.

The same behavior closed the provisioning for visitors at hospitals. To much distress among the ethnic Danish patients.

So, maybe the immigrants should bring their own juice and cookies to the beach next summer and watch some nice, danish, bare breasts. That's immigration.

Update:
Ib Steen Mikkelsen, who is the hospital director at Køge Hospital, says that immigrants inviting the family for a free meal has never been a problem. To Danish news service Newspaq he says:

Everyone who has worked in the hospital service knows that immigrants have more visitors than ethnic Danish patients. But that does not have to be a negative thing – it just means that they have more visits, which is nice for the patient.

Health spokesperson for The Social Democrats, Sophie Hæstorp Andersen adds (also to Newspaq):

It is completely wrong to blame the immigrants for the fact that there is no juice or cookies at the doctor. Fact is, that at a lot of places it has been removed out of hygienic reasons, so people don't get stumach infections.
Notes:
  1. Read more about The Danish Immigration Service []
  2. Article in Danish: DPP: Show bare breasts in new film about Denmark []
  3. Danish Wikipedia article: Peter Skaarup []
  4. Article in Danish: DPP rejoice: We get the tightest immigration policy in Europe []
  5. Read the party newsletter (PDF) []

Danish People's Party vs sanity – the satellite dish edition

Previously, the Danish People's Party[1], in Danish 'Dansk Folkeparti', have been rather quiet with their more "extreme" views. But the past days, they've let the brake go a little in relation to the ongoing discussion here in Denmark regarding the ghetto areas with high concentrations of immigrants.

Yesterday, Saturday, Pia Kjærsgaard[2] who is the co-founder and current leader of the party, suggested that satellite dishes should be banned in the ghettos. Yes, you heard that right: banned. Kjærsgaard calls tv stations as Al Jazeera and al Arabiya »indoctrination«[3].

Al Jazeera and al Arabiya is indoctrination from the Middle Eastern world. It's mind control, when you are imbued a hatred to the part of the world, you're living in.

Our current government, who relies on Mrs Kjærsgaard and her party comrades for the majority, where quick to dismiss the proposal. Naser Khader, spokesman for the Conservatives, says he thought it was »an April's fool«[4].

If you thought that would make Pia Kjærsgaard withraw the rather radical suggestion, think again. If you can't ban the satellite dishes, ban the TV channels, she says[5].

Other politicians have pointed out that the TV channels in question can be watched over the internet, but Kjærsgaard stands her ground, arguing that the believes there is a difference between watching it via the internet and »having a TV running from morning till evening with this indoctrinating hatred«.

Strong words.

But doesn't it all sound familiar? Doesn't it sound like something that was tried south of our border, say, 70 years ago? Yes it does. Why?

The German case
Well, in the 1930ies the rulers of the Nazi party where quite keen on keeping foreign transmissions away from the ears of the German people. To make sure this happened, it was made illegal in 1939 to listen to foreign broadcasters. On top of that, the German government decided to sell a cheap radio that could not pick up distant signals very well[6]. The cheap radio was called the "Volksempfänger"[7].

Here is a picture from back in those days (click for larger size):

Nazi note on foreign/international transmitters

It roughly translates into:

Remember
The listening to foreign broadcasts is a crime against the national security of our people. It is sanctioned on the orders of the leader with heavy prison sentences.

Switch to cable
Actually, the Nazi "trick" by selling a cheap radio unable to catch foreign broadcasters is not far from what Mrs Kjærsgaard has in mind:

It's possible that it's both practially, politically and legally hard, not to mention impossible, to ban satellite dishes [..] Therefore I would like to make another suggestion, where I say that if you can not ban the satellite dishes, and you probably can not, well, then the housing associations will have to get cable tv, which is a more marketable and passable route.

Now, while this of course doesn't mean that we'll be banning TV channels that do not suite us, I find it rather disturbing to see an A list politician making suggestions like this. No doubt, it's about Mrs Kjærsgaard getting her voice out there to "brand" her as a fullblown anti-immigration politician. Mission accomplished.

There will no doubt be people out there saying "she has got a point, you know?" – and thereby they will be reinforced in their view, however naïve and prehistoric it might be.

Update:
A Danish professor on Arabic media says that the fact that Pia Kjærsgaard wants to ban Al Jazeera and al Arabiya (two of the most respected and widely quoted Arabic media, also in the Western media) indicates that she does not have a lot of knowledge on the subject[8].

Notes:
  1. Wikipedia: Danish People's Party []
  2. Wikipedia: Pia Kjærsgaard []
  3. Article in Danish: Pia Kjærsgaard wants to ban satellite dishes in Vollsmose []
  4. Article in Danish: The goverment shoots ban on satellite dishes down []
  5. Article in Danish: Pia K: Well, then ban the TV channels []
  6. Wikipedia: International Broadcasting #Restricting reception []
  7. Wikipedia: Volksempfänger []
  8. Article in Danish: Danish professor: I guess Pia K. does not know a lot about Arabic TV []

The Cribs: Ignore The Ignorant

I really, really like Last.fm, the social music recommendations website/service. A lot of the new (and older) stuff I come across there days, I find via Last.fm[1].

It's so simple. I listen to a lot of music with Last.fm's scrobble software installed, and the information about what music I listen to is pushed to my profile[2]. The Last.fm engine then uses all of this data to recommend me music.

Today I once again logged in to see what Last.fm had for me this time. I came across a band called 'The Cribs'[3] that I remember having read about last year, about ex-The Smiths guitarist Johnny Marr joining them. I decided to take their latest album ('Ignore The Ignorant'[4]) for a spin at 7digital and ended up being the whole album.

Cover for The Cribs - Ignore The Ignorant (Click for slightly larger size)

Cover for The Cribs - Ignore The Ignorant (Click for slightly larger size)

I haven't heard any of the earlier The Cribs stuff, so I can't say how they've changed in their sound, or haven't, but there a quite a lot of The Smiths reminiscence on the album, something that is very likely to have been added by Marr's renowned way of handling a guitar.

My absolute favourite track on the album has to be 'We Share The Same Skies':

If you can't hear Johnny Marr's past appearances in this, you haven't listened to The Smiths. Still, it's a great track. Strong verse, catchy chorus.

But it really would be a shame to name one songs ahead of the others, since it's an unusually strong album for our day and age, with the internet and all.

Go and get it. If you're into that sort of thing, that is.

Notes:
  1. View my profile at Last.fm []
  2. Read more about scrobbling at Last.fm's 'About' page []
  3. Read about The Cribs on Wikipedia []
  4. Buy 'Ignore The Ignorant' at 7digital []